A new poll conducted by the National Taxpayers Union shows that Americans have varying opinions on proposed plans to bail out subprime borrowers…
A new poll conducted by the National Taxpayers Union shows that Americans have varying opinions on proposed plans to bail out subprime borrowers…
Watch more related videos:
View Housing Market Watch RSS feedA new poll conducted by the National Taxpayers Union shows that Americans have varying opinions on proposed plans to bail out subprime borrowers. Survey respondents weighed in on whether or not government intervention is necessary and who would benefit most from a taxpayer-funded bailout.
The majority of those surveyed were opposed to a taxpayer-funded bailout of the subprime mortgage market, but there were a surprising number of respondents who either support it or have no opinion.
 |
Source: National Taxpayers Union
There was also some disagreement as to who would benefit from a government-funded bailout of the subprime mortgage market. Nearly half of all respondents think a bailout would be most beneficial to lenders or Wall Street banks that profit from subprime mortgages.
Twenty-six percent believe that homeowners with subprime mortgages would benefit the most and ten percent didn't know. Three percent of respondents clearly didn't understand the question and said that taxpayers would get the most out of the deal.
 |
Source: National Taxpayers Union
The most interesting results came from a question about legislation that would allow the FHA and other government-sponsored entities to increase the size of loans they could buy and insure.
The majority of respondents--66 percent--said these proposals are 'nothing more than a taxpayer-funded bailout of mortgage lenders and banks that provided and profited from these risky loans.' The remaining 34 percent called taxpayer backed refinancing programs 'necessary' in order to prevent foreclosures and falling home prices.
Everyone is entitled to an opinion and people very rarely think the same way. The above poll demonstrates that completely.
That said, most people aren't nearly as worried as they should be about proposed government plans. A bailout of the subprime mortgage market would be expensive to taxpayers, not to mention grossly unfair.
There is no way to bail out subprime borrowers without bailing out the banks that made the loans. More to the point, neither party deserves a bailout. Both were driven by greed and both entered into the mortgage and home market at their own risk.
The argument that the majority of borrowers were somehow 'duped' into bad subprime loans is preposterous. While predatory lending is always present somewhere in the market, it takes two parties to make a deal.
If subprime borrowers would have been honest with themselves about what they could afford and if they had taken the time to read paperwork, crunch numbers and do all of the other things that come along with buying a house, they wouldn't be in this mess.
As for taxpayer-backed refinance programs--they are nothing more than a bailout. These programs transfer risk directly and purposely to the taxpayer. Expanding these programs is one of the greatest mistakes that could be made in this situation.
Home prices have been artificially inflated for years. Once a bubble forms, it is inevitable that it will eventually pop. Refinance programs will not stop this. It is despicable that our policymakers have the audacity even to insinuate that a solution like this is good for the nation.
This is an open letter addressed to all of the struggling mortgage borrowers (and their lenders) sitting on their haunches waiting for the government to come to their rescue.
U.S. Senate lawmakers have decided to press on with their unethical and irresponsible mortgage bailout bill despite a veto threat from the White House.
The housing crisis is a big issue for many voters. Not surprisingly, John McCain and Barack Obama offer vastly different plans to solve it. Let's see where they stand.
Falling prices are eroding the value of U.S. homes. According to a new Fed report, the equity that Americans have in their homes has dropped to the lowest level on record.
A survey commissioned by a national federation of state and local apartment associations shows that most renters will not be jumping into the U.S. housing market anytime soon. Has renting become the smart decision?
Some politicians are in favor of providing assistance to the millions of homeowners who are facing default as a result of poor decision-making and falling home prices. Others are dead set against it. Let's see where the American people stand.
Small banks and big ones alike are on the verge of bankruptcy, due to all of the bad loans that have been approved over the past few years. Although people tend to assume that their money will be safe even if their banks fail, history has shown that this isn't always the case. Find out if your hard-earned cash is at risk.
When it comes to home prices, location matters. Consider this: a $210,000 home in Atlanta, GA would be worth $1.4 million in Beverly Hills. The same home would be worth $509,000 in Washington D.C. and $207,000 in Phoenix. Find out how much homes might be worth in different cities in this home price comparison.
An open letter to all of the lawmakers and taxpayers who think a mortgage bailout is what we need to solve the housing crisis.
A national survey found that Stamford, Connecticut has most expensive rents among other U.S. cities. Residents need a household wage of $31.58 to afford fair market rent on a two-bedroom rental unit. Find out which other metro areas and states have high housing costs.
To get borrowers to leave a house--and leave it in good condition--mortgage lenders around the nation have begun offering cash for keys. Some lenders are paying out upwards of $3,000.
Republicans and Democrats are working on a new measure inappropriately named ''The Foreclosure Prevention Act of 2008''. This legislation is being billed as help for homeowners, but homebuilders and the mortgage industry are the true beneficiaries.